Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Yes, I'm Naive
Whinny for Wine?
The problem is, I just looked at the ingredients and it says it has wine in it. I don't typically cook with any form of alcohol, but I also don't usually have problems eating something that has some in it, if it's been cooked so all the alcohol has worn off (like wine in a marinade). The thing is, I don't know if fondue counts. What do you guys think? Am I overreacting here? Can I eat my fondue??? I really want to... but I also don't want to be violating the Word of Wisdom or anything. Hmm...
Other than my serious fondue wine dilemmas, life is going pretty good. I have a writing buzz. As in, I've been thinking about writing and writing so much that my head is buzzing (the way it does for me when I've been consumed by a good book). I've set a goal to write every day, and I have so far. I'm going to throw out some of what I've written, I'm sure, but it still feels good to just do it and not be afraid to try.
Okay, I seriously need to take a break from any form of writing and just relax... so until next time... (-Jocelyn)
PS- Look at the cute pictures of Peter the Horsey! Isn't he ADORABLE?!?!?!
Monday, October 29, 2007
I Love Naptime!
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Historocity
I must say that any of you who have not seen at least a couple of these sites need to make it a priority to go in your lifetime. They included some very memorable experiences and definitely made me appreciate the history of our country more deeply.
DAY 1
Manasses, the site of the first civil war battle. Both sides thought it would be the only battle, and both sides had spectators sitting on the hillside watching it as if it were entertainment; they thought that the other side would cave and the dispute would be ended very quickly.
Needless to say, all were wrong. The casualties suffered in this battle were catastrophic, with the union taking most of the blows. Both armies woke up after that, and began preparing their men to be better soldiers, thus ensuring a long and drawn-out civil war.
Shots from a campground in Shenandoah National Park
Day 2
University of Virginia. Established by Thomas Jefferson.
Thomas Jefferson's Thinking Hut (Monticello)
Peter sleeping on a big bed
Day 3
Williamsburg tavern. Peter is ready to eat.
Soldiers marching down Main Street.
The women actors were crazy about Peter!
I got drafted!
Day 4
Yorktown. The Revolutionary War was won here. The tour guide told us I think 10 unbelievable things that happened at this spot to give the Americans the victory. It was an inspiring tale.
(-Robert)
Wednesday, October 24, 2007
100
Sunday, October 14, 2007
Spooky
On Saturday night, Jocelyn and I dropped Peter off with the babysitters, a couple in our ward that have agreed to take babysitting turns with us. They had set up a pack-and-play portable crib in their bathroom (because it's dark) and there Peter slept like an angel--well, at least the kind of angel that doesn't make any sounds, as opposed to the kind of angel that Alma the younger envisioned, the kind that would shake the earth and declare repentance with a loud voice (these are the kinds of things we hoped Peter would not do when we dropped him off with the babysitters).
Anyway, off we went to the Rosslyn Spectrum theater, where we saw an awesome adaptation of Edgar Allen Poe's "The Fall of the House of Usher."
It was rad. Definitely a good Halloween treat, and something we could have only seen, I think, in the D.C. area.
(-Robert)
P.S. Here's some cute videos of Peter.
Friday, October 12, 2007
WLC 5: Circle
But I WILL take lots of pictures and share. OOOOH, I forgot one of the prettiest parts of our trip: we're driving to Williamsburg via the beautiful Shenandoah Valley. The leaves are just turning and I'm hoping they speed along the process so that by next week, we'll have a colorful drive. Lots of colors or not, I'm sure it will be gorgeous. And no, I haven't been to ANY of these places, so I am super excited!!!
Peter and Dada snuggling cheek to cheek (Peter loves smushing his cheek into our cheeks -- so sweet!)
Well, love to all. Sorry I am blabbing at you so excessively, but I hope you have a great day and a great weekend. (-Jocelyn)
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Tuesday, October 9, 2007
WLC 4: Smile!
Tuesday, October 2, 2007
3: A Magic Number
...which he just completed, last night! Yay for Honey!
Hmm... what IS that in Peter's mouth?
Ewe!!! (While Robert plays Zelda, haha.)
Monday, October 1, 2007
A Moment in TIME
Two cool bits of news on the D.C. front.
First, I got a letter to the editor published in the latest issue of TIME magazine (dated Oct. 8, 2007). This letter was in response to an article about U.S. presidents and their religious beliefs, written by Michael Kinsley in the Sep. 17, 2007 issue of TIME; it was called God as Their Running Mate. I won't explain the entire article; you can read it at your own leisure. But I would like to talk about my letter-writing experience.
When I wrote the letter, I made some assumptions. I have heard (but have not actually fact-checked well) that every president we've had so far has believed in God. I know there have been wide variations in the range of belief, but they believed in God nonetheless. I extended that assumption/fact to say they all belonged to religions which believed in "improbabilities" (a term used by the author of the article), which is less likely to be true. The beauty of making bold, unfounded claims in letters to the editor is that it puts the responsibility of fact-checking on them. I could sound confident in my letter, knowing that if I was factually wrong, my letter wasn't going to be published anyway and no big loss. If I was right, I saved myself some time with my guesswork.
So here's the letter (via e-mail) I submitted:
According to Michael Kinsley's definition, every President this country has ever had has been "too credulous to be President," since all of them have belonged to religions which believe literally some "improbabilities" inherent in Christian doctrine. It sounds like Michael Kinsley thinks you can't be a good president unless you are in line with Kinsley's personal preferences. Fortunately, the majority of the country doesn't share his view.So of course I was surprised when, on September 28, I received an e-mail informing me that my letter would appear in the Oct. 8 issue of TIME (currently on newsstands).
I looked online to see my letter. Here's what the TIME-approved version said:
In "God as Their Running Mate," Michael Kinsley said that, for him, anyone who believes in the literal truth of religious texts is "too credulous to be President" [Sept 17]. That would apply to a number of our past Presidents. Kinsley seems to think you can't be a good President unless you are in line with Kinsley's personal preferences.And you know what? I can't argue with TIME's edits here. They toned it down a lot, but they made me sound more credible.
The more exciting news of the day is that I competed in an ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) competition last Saturday, and was one of a few very lucky people to be offered a position on the ADR board (I think 10% of people who compete make it).
The specific issues we were trying to resolve in this competition related to an impending divorce action. My partner and I were representing the husband, and the other side was representing the wife. We met to discuss custody issues, child support, assets, and a few other things.
It went extremely well, actually. We all treated each other very respectfully and things went very smoothly. We were afraid that the wife was harboring ill feelings toward the husband (she was the one who had initiated the divorce action), but she didn't. We all felt like the agreement we'd reached at the end of the negotiations was good, and the judges were very congratulatory.
One of the funniest parts of the negotiation occured when we were discussing the car situation. The wife's attorneys suggested that she keep the BMW while our client (Tom) keep the minivan (since he was going to have custody of the kids).
We said this was fine, but since the BMW was worth so much more than the minivan, we expected an additional asset to compensate. The other side suggested the $30,000 boat, which had been a gift from the wife to Tom. I started to say, "OK," because I felt the negotiations were going so well and was glad to getting the boat for our client. But my partner stopped me and said, "Well, the boat was a gift. We don't think that it would be fair to consider that a compromise."
So then the other side suggested that the compromise could come in the time share. And I said yes, it would be appropriate to have the wife pay for maintenance and expenses on the time share, and in exchange, she could keep the BMW.
So we definitely got a good deal there. On the other hand, Tom in this case was the stay-at-home dad and Mary (the wife) was making $280,000 a year as an attorney, so a few expenses here and there for her should have been no big deal.
So what does being on the ADR board mean? I don't know. I think it means I have the chance to travel and compete with other law schools. And it's something I can put on a resume.
(-Robert)